Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates that elevated admission serum uric acid predicts contrast-induced nephropathy in heart attack patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, highlighting a simple risk marker.
Developing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) has a negative impact on survival and morbidity. We assessed the predictive value of serum uric acid (SUA) for the development of CIN in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent pPCI. Contrast-induced nephropathy was defined an increase of ≥25% or ≥0.5 mg/dL in creatinine concentrations within 72 hours after pPCI. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to admission median SUA level. Serum uric acid level was <5.4 mg/dL (group 1; n = 222) and ≥5.4 mg/dL (group 2; n = 228). Compared to group 1, development of CIN (12% vs 20%, P < .001) was significantly greater in group 2. Using a cut point of >5.45 mg/dL, the SUA level predicted development of CIN with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 67%. In multiple logistic regression analysis, SUA level, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, contrast volume, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and C-reactive protein level emerged as independent predictors of CIN. In conclusion, elevated SUA is an independent risk factor for the development of CIN after pPCI in patients with STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendi et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: