The physical efficiency of a light source, ∊, defined as the ratio of radiant power output to electrical power input, which a monochromatic semiconductor radiation source must have to compete with a high temperature radiation source is investigated. Detailed calculations of ∊ are given for infrared and visible illumination. In an infrared system, where an S–1 detector is used, in order for a GaAs diode to be competitive with the infrared produced by a filtered tungsten lamp operated at 3000°K, an ∊ value of 6.4% is required of the diode. For production of visible light a minimum physical efficiency of 4% is required for an optimum monochromatic source which radiates near 555 nm, the peak of the eye sensitivity curve. An efficiency of 100% is required at λ = 445 nm and λ = 642 nm. Monochromatic sources with wavelengths greater than 642 nm and less than 445 nm can never compete with the effective illumination of a 3000°K tungsten lamp for the human eye. Semiconductor light sources are shown to have far higher effective power radiated per unit area of source than tungsten lamps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weinreich et al. (1964) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: