Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Iceland is one of the most active and productive terrestrial volcanic regions, with eruption frequency of ≥20 events per century and magma output rates of ≥5 km 3 per century.Although Iceland is dominated by mac magmatism and volcanism, as is evident from 91:6:3 distribution of mac, intermediate and silicic eruptions, its record also features most common terrestrial magma types and eruption styles.Postglacial volcanism is conned to the neovolcanic zones where 30 active volcanic systems are responsible for most of the Holocene activity.On the basis of our current post-glacial eruption data set we estimate that Icelandic volcanism has produced around 2400 eruptions and about 566±100 km 3 of erupted magma in the last 11 ka.Effusive activity accounts for ∼500 eruptions; the remainder is explosive and dictated by subglacial mac events (∼77%), demonstrating strong environmental inuence on eruption styles in Iceland.In terms of magma output the record is dominated by large volume (>1 km 3 ) effusive mac eruptions.About 50 such eruptions have occurred throughout postglacial time or ∼2% of the total number of eruptions.However, collectively these events produced about 55% of the postglacial magma volume.The Eastern Volcanic Zone is responsible for >80% of the eruptions and ∼60% of the erupted magma volume and has been by far the most prolic producer among the neovolcanic zones.Furthermore, the volume of mac effusive eruptions is not evenly distributed through post-glacial time, because only 30% (∼111 km 3 ) of the total volume was produced in the last 5 ka and the remaining 70% ( 258 km 3 ) between 5-11 ka.However, the production rate per millennia within these two periods appears to be fairly even, ranging from 20-30 km 3 in <5 ka period and 35-40 km 3 in the 5-10 ka interval.The exception is the 10-11 ka interval, when ∼70 km 3 of mac lava was formed by the effusive activity or close to double the volume produced per millennia in the period that followed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thórdarson et al. (2008) studied this question.