Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This article seeks to analyze the concept of the long‐term orientation of relationships in the supply chain (SC). This research aims to study interactions between satisfaction and commitment with the relational perspective of firm‐supplier relationships. Design/methodology/approach The establishment of a “post‐satisfaction” framework is necessary. A model based on structural equations is used to test the set of hypotheses. Findings The findings show that cooperation, communication, satisfaction, proved trust and commitment explain the long‐term orientation of the relationships in the SC. Research limitations/implications This research only considers the buyer's perspective. The article considers some implications relating to different profiles of trust. Practical implications The article includes several implications about how to communicate with customers and suppliers, how to cooperate with customers and suppliers, why buyers trust suppliers, how buyers perceive satisfaction, and how buyers commit to suppliers. Originality/value This research, based on its “post‐satisfaction” approach, aims to complete the framework proposed by Cambra and Polo. Ideas related to the evolution of trust (“previous” vs “proved” trust) are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cambra‐Fierro et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: