Key result
Higher forced vital capacity (fourth vs first quartile) was associated with a 23% lower risk of CVD events in older adults with metabolic syndrome (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60-0.99).
Why the study?
Do lung-function measures predict incident cardiovascular disease events in older adults with metabolic syndrome, diabetes, or neither?
Cohort (n=4,114)
Do lung-function measures predict incident cardiovascular disease events in older adults with metabolic syndrome, diabetes, or neither?
Higher lung function (FEV1 and FVC) is inversely related to CVD risk in older adults with and without metabolic syndrome, but provides limited incremental risk prediction beyond standard risk factors mainly to metabolically healthier persons.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support FVC as a risk marker in metabolic syndrome; leaves open incremental prediction beyond standard factors.
Background Individuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and diabetes (DM) are more likely to have decreased lung function and are at greater risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Hypothesis. Lung‐function measures can predict CVD events in older persons with MetS, DM, and neither condition. Methods We followed 4114 participants age ≥ 65 years with and without MetS or DM in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Cox regression examined the association of forced vital capacity (FVC) and 1‐second forced expiratory volume (FEV1; percent of predicted values) with incident coronary heart disease and CVD events over 12.9 years. Results DM was present in 537 (13.1%) and MetS in 1277 (31.0%) participants. Comparing fourth vs first quartiles for FVC, risk of CVD events was 16% (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.59–1.18), 23% (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.60–0.99), and 30% (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58–0.84) lower in DM, MetS, and neither disease groups, respectively. For FEV1, CVD risk was lower by 2% (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.70–1.37), 26% (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.59–0.93), and 31% (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.57–0.82) in DM. Findings were strongest for predicting congestive heart failure (CHF) in all disease groups. C‐statistics increased significantly with addition of FEV1 or FVC over risk factors for CVD and CHF among those with neither MetS nor DM. Conclusions FEV1 and FVC are inversely related to CVD in older adults with and without MetS, but not DM (except for CHF); however, their value in incremental risk prediction beyond standard risk factors is limited mainly to metabolically healthier persons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Metabolic syndrome and diabetes (n=4,114). Forced vital capacity (FVC) and 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1) vs. First quartile of FVC/FEV1 was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular disease events (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.99). Higher forced vital capacity (fourth vs first quartile) was associated with a 23% lower risk of CVD events in older adults with metabolic syndrome (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60-0.99).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: