Flat structures consisting of dense dye‐sensitized TiO2 films with various materials for dye regeneration (TiO2/dye/regeneration material) are compared. Au and PEDOT:PSS were tested as metal or metal‐like regeneration materials and compared with reference compounds, such as the redox couple I−/I in solution and p‐type CuSCN. Under the exclusion of TiO2 bandgap excitation, the short‐circuit photocurrent densities for the various structures differ by less than ∼30%, suggesting comparable charge separation efficiencies. The good performance of a metallic regeneration material implies, that the frequently assumed requirement of p‐type or ‘hole conducting’ properties for the regeneration material in solid state dye solar cells is questionable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lenzmann et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: