Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The title compounds 6 and 7 were synthesized in good yield (Schemes 1 and 2), and their mode of assembly was studied both in solution, for the tetrakis(decyloxy) derivative 6, and in the crystal, for the tetramethoxy analogue 7. The pyrimidin‐2‐amine moieties of 6 and 7 can engage in three different supramolecular interactions: i) metal ligation via one of the pyrimidine N‐atoms, ii) cooperative double H‐bonding via the NH2 group, and iii) π–π‐stacking interactions. In solution, coordination of the central Zn‐atom within the soluble porphyrinatozinc complex 19 leads to significant changes in the NMR and absorption spectra of 6. In the absence of metal ligation, the next strongest interaction is H‐bonding which can operate in nonpolar or moderately polar solvents. In these cases, however, no stacking interaction or inclusion compounds could be put into evidence in the case of 6 by absorption, fluorescence, or NMR spectroscopies. The π‐stacking interactions were only observed in the crystal of 7 in conjunction with double H‐bonding. Slightly disordered DMSO molecules are also H‐bonded to the NH2 groups of 7, perturbing the expected packing. The present study illustrates some of the challenges inherent to directing hierarchical assembly processes in the solid state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balaban et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: