Comparison of two second‐generation anti‐hepatitis C virus ELISA on 21431 US blood donor samples

We have compared two different second-generation (2.0) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for the presence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in blood from volunteer, unpaid donors. At two separate blood centres, a total of 21,431 donor samples were tested with Abbott Anti-HCV 2.0 ELISA and Ortho Anti-HCV 2.0 ELISA. Samples found to be repeatedly reactive were tested by supplemental/investigational assays. MATRIX HCV (Abbott) and anti-HCV RIBA II (Ortho/Chiron), to 'confirm' the presence of anti-HCV. Discordant ELISA samples were additionally tested by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the presence of HCV RNA. The Abbott anti-HCV assay had a repeatedly reactive rate of 0.59% (127/21,431) and the Ortho anti-HCV assay 0.51% (110/21,431). Overall agreement between assays was 99.76%, 72/127 (56.7%) of Abbott repeatedly reactive samples confirmed on MATRIX and 61/127 (48.0%) on RIBAII; 70/110 (63.6%) of Ortho repeatedly reactivate samples confirmed on MATRIX and 61/110 (55.5%) on RIBA II. Discordant ELISA samples tested by PCR yielded negative results. Hence the two ELISA had equal sensitivity, as defined by detection of true positive samples; the slightly lower specificity of the Abbott Anti-HCV 2.0 ELISA may be owing to culling of donors with a false positive test by Ortho's Anti-HCV 1.0 and 2.0 ELISA tests (the routine tests in place at each blood centre). A sample found to be repeatedly reactive by two different ELISA tests for anti-HCV is likely to be a true positive and may not require further 'confirmatory' testing.