Key result
Temperature-responsive rate adaptive pacing (VVIR) increased exercise duration compared to fixed-rate pacing (VVI) during treadmill exercise testing.
Why the study?
Does rate adaptive pacing using a blood temperature sensor improve exercise duration and heart rate response compared to fixed rate pacing in patients with pacemakers?
RCT (n=45)
randomized
Yes
Does rate adaptive pacing using a blood temperature sensor improve exercise duration and heart rate response compared to fixed rate pacing in patients with pacemakers?
Rate adaptive pacing using blood temperature sensors significantly improves exercise duration and heart rate response in pacemaker-dependent patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports temperature-responsive VVIR pacing for better exercise tolerance in pacemaker patients; extends RCT evidence for rate-adaptive benefits.
UNLABELLED: Temperature responsive pacemakers were implanted in 45 patients (ages 44 to 90); 31 patients were evaluated by randomized, paired treadmill exercise tests 1 month postimplant. Of 28 males and 17 females, 19 had coronary artery disease; 8 had congestive heart failure. Pacing indications included sinus node disease (26), atrial fibrillation (15), AV block (10), and brady/tachy syndrome (10); some had multiple indications. Blood temperature (every 10 seconds, resolution = 0.004 degrees C) and pacing rate (every minute) were telemetered from the pacemaker. Average heart rate, exercise duration (5.7 min VVI; 6.7 min VVIR), VVIR response time (22 sec), initial temperature drop (0.23 degrees C) and maximum rate of drop (0.65 degrees C/min), temperature rise (0.31 degrees C VVI; 0.38 degrees C VVIR) and rate of rise (0.27 degrees C/min) were studied in a subset of patients. In pacer-dependent patients, average paired increases in exercise duration and heart rate was 56% and 34%, respectively. Including all (31) patients, some with intermittent sinus rhythm, increases were 28% and 9%, respectively. Because exercise duration increased, temperature rise was higher with rate adaptation. Rate adaptation was obtainable in all patients and patients averaged 99 +/- 48 increases above basic pacing rate per day at nominal temperature sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Beneficial rate adaptation is achievable using blood temperature to modify rate in a sensor based system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fearnot et al. (1989) conducted an RCT in Bradycardia requiring pacing (sinus node disease, atrial fibrillation, AV block, brady/tachy syndrome) (n=45). Temperature-responsive rate adaptive pacing (VVIR) vs. Fixed rate pacing (VVI) was evaluated on Exercise duration (minutes). Temperature-responsive rate adaptive pacing (VVIR) increased exercise duration compared to fixed-rate pacing (VVI) during treadmill exercise testing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: