Key result
Digital thermal monitoring temperature rebound area under the curve correlated closely with Doppler ultrasound blood velocity (r=0.97, P=0.0001) and demonstrated excellent repeatability.
Why the study?
Is digital thermal monitoring (DTM) reproducible and correlated with Doppler ultrasound for assessing vascular function in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=18)
Is digital thermal monitoring (DTM) reproducible and correlated with Doppler ultrasound for assessing vascular function in healthy volunteers?
Effect estimate: r = 0.97
p-value: p=0.0001
Digital thermal monitoring is a highly reproducible, operator-independent non-invasive test for assessing vascular function that correlates strongly with Doppler ultrasound.
DTM may serve as a reproducible research tool for vascular assessment; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation in patients.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated that digital thermal monitoring (DTM) of vascular reactivity, a new test for vascular function assessment, is well correlated with Framingham Risk Score, coronary calcium score and CT angiography. This study evaluates the variability and reproducibility of DTM measurements. We hypothesized that DTM is reproducible, and its variability falls within the accepted range of clinical diagnostic tests. METHOD: A fully automated DTM device (VENDYS, Endothelix Inc., Houston, TX, USA) was used for repeated measurement of vascular function in 18 healthy volunteers (age 35 ± 4 years, 74% men) after 24 h. All subjects underwent overnight fasting, and the test was preceded by 30-min rest in a supine position inside a dimmed room with temperature 22-24°C. The measurements were obtained during and after a 2-min supra systolic arm-cuff occlusion-induced reactive hyperaemia procedure. As a part of this study, the Doppler ultrasound hyperaemic, low-frequency, blood velocity of radial artery and a fingertip DTM of vascular function were compared simultaneously. Postcuff deflation temperature rebound and area under the curve, DTM indices of vascular function, were studied. RESULTS: Temperature rebound area under the curve correlated closely with Doppler hyperaemic, low-frequency, blood velocity (r = 0·97, P = 0·0001). Day-to-day intra-subject variability was 6·2% for baseline temperature, 8·7% for mean blood pressure and 11·4% for heart rate. The coefficient of repeatability of temperature rebound and area under the curve were 2·4% and 2·8%. CONCLUSION: In a controlled environment, the repeatability of DTM is excellent. DTM can be used as a reproducible and operator-independent test for non-invasive measurement of vascular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmadi et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=18). Digital thermal monitoring (DTM) vs. Doppler ultrasound was evaluated on Correlation between temperature rebound area under the curve and Doppler hyperaemic blood velocity (r = 0.97, p=0.0001). Digital thermal monitoring temperature rebound area under the curve correlated closely with Doppler ultrasound blood velocity (r=0.97, P=0.0001) and demonstrated excellent repeatability.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: