Key result
In VTE patients on warfarin, the SAMe-TT2-R2 score showed poor discrimination for time in therapeutic range (c-statistic 0.58) and did not predict recurrent VTE (ARD 0%; 95% CI -0.6 to 0.7).
Why the study?
While the SAMe-TT2-R2 score predicts poor VKA anticoagulation control in atrial fibrillation, its validity in patients with venous thromboembolism had not been established.
Does the SAMe-TT2-R2 score predict time in therapeutic range and clinical outcomes in patients with venous thromboembolism on warfarin?
Cohort (n=3,874)
Does the SAMe-TT2-R2 score predict time in therapeutic range and clinical outcomes in patients with venous thromboembolism on warfarin?
Absolute Risk Reduction: 0 (95% CI -0.6–0.7)
Absolute Risk Reduction: 0%
The SAMe-TT2-R2 score has poor discrimination for predicting time in therapeutic range and clinical outcomes in VTE patients on warfarin, limiting its clinical utility in this population.
Caution against using SAMe-TT2-R2 for TTR or outcome prediction in VTE; leaves open validation of VTE-specific tools.
BACKGROUND: Time in therapeutic range (TTR) measures the quality of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) anticoagulation. In patients with atrial fibrillation, the dichotomized SAMe-TT2-R2 score (≥2 vs. < 2 points) can predict if adequate TTR is unlikely to be achieved. AIMS: We validated the SAMe-TT2-R2 score in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) randomized to the warfarin arm of the Hokusai-VTE trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 3,874 patients were included in the primary analysis (day 31-180 from randomization). The efficacy and safety outcomes were symptomatic recurrent VTE and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. RESULTS: The rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding events were higher in patients with a TTR below the median (< 66% vs. ≥66%) resulting in an absolute risk difference (ARD) of +0.5% (95% confidence interval: 0%, +1.1%) and +2.2% (0.9%, +3.5%), respectively. Patients with high SAMe-TT2-R2 score were 76% of total and had lower median TTR (64.7% vs. 70.7%). The SAMe-TT2-R2 score exhibited low negative (0.59) and positive (0.52) predictive value (TTR threshold 66%), and poor discrimination (c-statistic, 0.58). ARD between patients with high and low score was 0% (-0.6%, +0.7%) for recurrence and +1.3% (-0.1%, +2.7%) for bleeding. Results were confirmed in sensitivity analyses focusing on the whole study period (day 1-365). CONCLUSION: In VTE patients, the SAMe-TT2-R2 score showed unsatisfactory discrimination and predictive value for individual TTR and did not correlate well with clinical outcomes. The choice of starting a patient on VKA cannot be based on this parameter and its routine use after VTE may not translate into clinical usefulness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barco et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Venous thromboembolism (VTE) (n=3,874). High SAMe-TT2-R2 score (≥2 points) vs. Low SAMe-TT2-R2 score (<2 points) was evaluated on Symptomatic recurrent VTE (ARD 0%, 95% CI -0.6 to 0.7). In VTE patients on warfarin, the SAMe-TT2-R2 score showed poor discrimination for time in therapeutic range (c-statistic 0.58) and did not predict recurrent VTE (ARD 0%; 95% CI -0.6 to 0.7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: