Experimental study demonstrates enhanced energy density and cycling stability in engineered tri-layer dielectric films, highlighting their promise for pulsed-discharge devices.
Achieving an excellent energy storage performance, together with a high cycling reliability, is desirable for expanding the technological applications of ferroelectric dielectrics. However, in a well-crystallized ferroelectric material, the concomitant high polarizability and low polarization-saturation field have led to a square-shaped polarization-electric field loop, fatally impairing both recoverable energy density (Wrec) and efficiency (η). Nanocrystalline ferroelectric films with a macroscopically amorphous structure have shown an improved Wrec and η, but their much-lower polarizability demands an extremely high electric field to achieve such performances, which is undesirable from economical viewpoints. Here, we propose a strategy to boost the energy storage performances and stabilities of ferroelectric capacitors simultaneously by constructing a tri-layer film in which a well-crystallized ferroelectric layer was sandwiched by two pseudo-linear dielectric layers with a dominant amorphous structure. In sol-gel-derived BaTiO3/(Pb,La,Ca)TiO3/BaTiO3 (BTO/PLCT/BTO) tri-layer films, we show that the above design is realized via a rapid thermal annealing which fully crystallized the middle PLCT layer while left the top/bottom BTO cap layers in a poor crystallization status. This sandwiched structure is endowed with an enhanced maximum polarization while a small remnant one, and a much-delayed polarization saturation, which corresponds to a large Wrec~80 J/cm3 and a high η~86%. Furthermore, the film showed an outstanding cycling-stability: its Wrec and η remain essentially unchanged after 109 electric cycles (DW/W<4%, Dη/η<2%). These good energy storage characteristics have proved the effectiveness of our proposed strategy, paving a way for the utilization of sandwiched films in applications of electric power systems and advanced pulsed-discharge devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: