Key result
A non-Newtonian shear-thinning model of pulsatile blood flow revealed attenuated volume flow rate and enhanced vorticity transport compared to a Newtonian fluid model.
A novel non-Newtonian shear-thinning model provides a more accurate estimation of instantaneous wall shear rate in pulsatile blood flow compared to traditional Newtonian models.
Challenges Newtonian assumptions in hemodynamic simulations; leaves open translation to human vascular risk assessment.
A non-Newtonian shear-thinning constitutive relation is proposed to study pulsatile flow of whole blood in a cylindrical tube. The constitutive relation, which satisfies the principle of material frame indifference, is derived from viscometric data obtained from whole blood over a range of hematocrits. Assuming axisymmetric flow in a rigid cylindrical tube of constant diameter, a second-order, nonlinear partial differential equation governing the axial velocity component is obtained. Imposing a periodic pressure gradient, the governing equation was solved numerically using finite difference methods over a range of Stokes values and hematocrits. For a forcing frequency of 1 Hz, results are presented over tube diameters ranging between 0.1 and 2 cm and over hematocrits ranging between 10 and 80%. For a given hematocrit, velocity profiles predicted for the non-Newtonian model under sinusoidal forcing reveal attenuated volume flow rate and enhanced vorticity transport over the tube cross-section relative to a Newtonian fluid having a viscosity corresponding to the high shear-rate limit. For moderate to high Stokes numbers, consistent with flow in large arteries, our results revealed a viscosity distribution that was nearly time invariant. An analytic solution was obtained for a fluid having arbitrarily prescribed radially varying, temporally invariant viscosity and density distributions under arbitrary periodic pressure forcing. Close agreement was observed between our numerical and analytical results when the imposed viscosity distribution was chosen to approximate the time-averaged viscosity distribution predicted by the shear-thinning non-Newtonian model. For St > or approximately= 100, the disparity between our results and those of a Newtonian fluid of constant viscosity grows with a decreasing ratio of the DC to AC components of the pressure-gradient amplitude below 50%. In particular, for any purely oscillatory pressure-gradient (vanishing DC component), the Womersley solution is a particularly poor predictor of the amplitude and phase of wall shear rate for over half of the flow cycle. Under such circumstances, the analytical models presented here provide a simple and accurate means of estimating instantaneous wall shear rate, knowing only the pressure gradient and hematocrit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
EL-KHATIB et al. (2003) studied Pulsatile blood flow. Non-Newtonian shear-thinning constitutive relation model vs. Newtonian fluid model was evaluated on Velocity profiles, volume flow rate, and wall shear rate. A non-Newtonian shear-thinning model of pulsatile blood flow revealed attenuated volume flow rate and enhanced vorticity transport compared to a Newtonian fluid model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: