Key result
Direct current cardioversion in AF patients after LAAO resulted in no thrombo-embolic events at 30 days, regardless of adherence to periprocedural anticoagulation or imaging guidelines.
Why the study?
No specific recommendations exist for DCCV in AF patients after LAAO, many of whom are ineligible for anticoagulation.
Does direct current cardioversion (DCCV) post-left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) without standard periprocedural anticoagulation increase thrombo-embolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational
Yes
Does direct current cardioversion (DCCV) post-left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) without standard periprocedural anticoagulation increase thrombo-embolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Direct current cardioversion in atrial fibrillation patients post-LAAO appears safe and effective with no thrombo-embolic events at 30 days, regardless of adherence to standard periprocedural anticoagulation guidelines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DCCV post-LAAO appears feasible without standard anticoagulation; leaves open optimal imaging and antithrombotic strategy pending randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend adequate anticoagulation for at least 3 weeks pre- and 4 weeks post-direct current cardioversion (DCCV) to reduce thrombo-embolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) lasting greater than 48 h. No specific recommendations exist for DCCV in patients that have undergone left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO), many of whom are ineligible for anticoagulation. This study aims to observe the efficacy and safety of DCCV post-LAAO in everyday clinical practice. METHODS: This prospective multicenter registry included DCCVs in patients post-LAAO. Imaging strategy or anticoagulation treatment around DCCV were analyzed. Complications during 30-day follow-up were registered. DCCVs performed in accordance with current guidelines for the general AF population were compared to DCCVs performed deviating from these guidelines. A wide variety of imaging or anticoagulation strategies around DCCV was observed; in 128 episodes strategies deviated from current guidelines. No thrombo-embolic events were observed after any DCCV during 30-day follow-up. In 34 DCCVs trans-esophageal echocardiography (TOE) was performed before DCCV to exclude cardiac thrombi and/or (re-)verify adequate device positioning. In two patients without post-LAAO imaging before DCCV, a device rotation or embolization was observed during scheduled TOE after LAAO. CONCLUSION: DCCV in AF patients after LAAO is highly effective. No thrombo-embolic events were observed in any patient in this observational cohort, regardless of the periprocedural anticoagulation or imaging strategy. Confirmation of adequate device positioning at least once before DCCV seems recommendable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maarse et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation post-left atrial appendage occlusion. Direct current cardioversion deviating from current anticoagulation/imaging guidelines vs. Direct current cardioversion in accordance with current guidelines was evaluated on Thrombo-embolic events during 30-day follow-up. Direct current cardioversion in AF patients after LAAO resulted in no thrombo-embolic events at 30 days, regardless of adherence to periprocedural anticoagulation or imaging guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: