Key result
Ischemic preconditioning did not affect any measure of neuromuscular function during intense exercise, regardless of tissue oxygenation.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether ischemic preconditioning-mediated effects on neuromuscular function are dependent on tissue oxygenation.
Does ischemic preconditioning improve neuromuscular function during intense exercise in resistance-trained males?
RCT (n=11)
Does ischemic preconditioning improve neuromuscular function during intense exercise in resistance-trained males?
Ischemic preconditioning does not improve neuromuscular function during intense exercise, regardless of tissue oxygenation levels.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
IPC shows no neuromuscular benefit during intense exercise regardless of oxygenation; leaves open any performance role in athletes.
The aim of the present study was to determine whether ischemic preconditioning (IPC)-mediated effects on neuromuscular function are dependent on tissue oxygenation. Eleven resistance-trained males completed four exercise trials (6 sets of 11 repetitions of maximal effort dynamic single-leg extensions) in either normoxic [fraction of inspired oxygen ([Formula: see text]): 21%) or hypoxic [Formula: see text]: 14%] conditions, preceded by treatments of either IPC (3 × 5 min bilateral leg occlusions at 220 mmHg) or sham (3 × 5 min at 20 mmHg). Femoral nerve stimulation was utilized to assess voluntary activation and potentiated twitch characteristics during maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs). Tissue oxygenation (via near-infrared spectroscopy) and surface electromyography activity were measured throughout the exercise task. MVC and twitch torque declined 62 and 54%, respectively (MVC: 96 ± 24 N·m, Cohen’s d = 2.9, P < 0.001; twitch torque: 37 ± 11 N·m, d = 1.6, P < 0.001), between pretrial measurements and the sixth set without reductions in voluntary activation ( P > 0.21); there were no differences between conditions. Tissue oxygenation was reduced in both hypoxic conditions compared with normoxia ( P < 0.001), with an even further reduction of 3% evident in the hypoxic IPC compared with the sham trial (mean decrease 1.8 ± 0.7%, d = 1.0, P < 0.05). IPC did not affect any measure of neuromuscular function regardless of tissue oxygenation. A reduction in [Formula: see text] did invoke a humoral response and improved muscle O2extraction during exercise, however, it did not manifest into any performance benefit. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Ischemic preconditioning did not affect any facet of neuromuscular function regardless of the degree of tissue oxygenation. Reducing the fraction of inspired oxygen induced localized tissue deoxygenation, subsequently invoking a humoral response, which improved muscle oxygen extraction during exercise. This physiological response, however, did not manifest into any performance benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halley et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=11). Ischemic preconditioning vs. Sham (3 × 5 min at 20 mmHg) was evaluated on Neuromuscular function (voluntary activation and potentiated twitch characteristics) (p=>0.21). Ischemic preconditioning did not affect any measure of neuromuscular function during intense exercise, regardless of tissue oxygenation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: