Key result
Ischemic preconditioning significantly increased skeletal muscle oxygenation during handgrip exercise at 25% MVC in response to sympathetic activation compared to sham (4.2% vs 2.0%, P=0.027).
Why the study?
Does ischemic preconditioning improve functional sympatholysis during handgrip exercise in healthy young men?
RCT (n=15)
randomized
Does ischemic preconditioning improve functional sympatholysis during handgrip exercise in healthy young men?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.2% vs 2%
p-value: p=0.027
Ischemic preconditioning alters skeletal muscle tissue oxygenation during sympathetic stimulation at rest and during moderate exercise in healthy volunteers.
May enhance sympatholysis in healthy young men during exercise; leaves open clinical translation and performance impact.
Repeated bouts of ischemia followed by reperfusion, known as ischemic preconditioning (IPC), is found to improve exercise performance. As redistribution of blood from the inactive areas to active skeletal muscles during exercise (i.e., functional sympatholysis) is important for exercise performance, we examined the hypothesis that IPC improves functional sympatholysis in healthy, young humans. In a randomized study, 15 healthy young men performed a 10-min resting period, dynamic handgrip exercise at 10% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), and 25% MVC. This protocol was preceded by IPC (IPC; 4 × 5-min 220-mmHg unilateral occlusion) or a sham intervention (CON; 4 × 5-min 20-mmHg unilateral occlusion). Near-infrared spectroscopy was used to assess changes in oxygenated hemoglobin and myoglobin in skeletal muscle (HbO2 + MbO2) in response to sympathetic activation (via cold pressor test (CPT)) at baseline and during handgrip exercise (at 10% and 25%). In resting conditions, HbO2 + MbO2 significantly decreased during CPT (-11.0 ± 1.0%), which was significantly larger during the IPC-trial (-13.8 ± 1.2%, P = 0.006). During handgrip exercise at 10% MVC, changes in HbO2 + MbO2 in response to the CPT were blunted after IPC (-8.8 ± 1.5%) and CON (-8.3 ± 0.4%, P = 0.593). During handgrip exercise at 25% MVC, HbO2 + MbO2 in response to the CPT increased (2.0 ± 0.4%), whereas this response was significantly larger when preceded by IPC (4.2 ± 0.6%, P = 0.027). Collectively, these results indicate that IPC-induced different vascular changes at rest and during moderate exercise in response to sympathetic activation. This suggests that, in healthy volunteers, exposure to IPC may alter tissue oxygenation during sympathetic stimulation at rest and during exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horiuchi et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in healthy, young humans (n=15). Ischemic preconditioning vs. Sham intervention (4 × 5-min 20-mmHg unilateral occlusion) was evaluated on Changes in skeletal muscle oxygenation (HbO2 + MbO2) in response to sympathetic activation during handgrip exercise at 25% MVC (p=0.027). Ischemic preconditioning significantly increased skeletal muscle oxygenation during handgrip exercise at 25% MVC in response to sympathetic activation compared to sham (4.2% vs 2.0%, P=0.027).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: