Key result
Capillary filtration rate was significantly lower in limbs with occlusive arterial disease compared to normal limbs (0.049 vs 0.061 ml/100g/min; P=0.01).
Why the study?
Does arterial reconstruction affect capillary filtration rate in patients with occlusive arterial disease?
Observational (n=31)
Does arterial reconstruction affect capillary filtration rate in patients with occlusive arterial disease?
The reduction in capillary filtration rate immediately after arterial reconstruction suggests that post-reconstructive edema is not caused by increased capillary filtration.
Reduced capillary filtration in diseased limbs suggests post-reconstructive edema is unrelated to increased filtration; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation.
Capillary filtration rate (CFR) was measured by a mercury-in-silastic strain-gauge around the forefoot when the forefoot was lowered 40 cm below heart level. In seven normal limbs, CFR was 0.061 (0.049-0.086) ml (100 g min)-1 against 0.049 (0.016-0.071) ml (100 g min)-1 in 24 limbs with occlusive arterial disease (P = 0.01). About 8 days after arterial reconstruction CFR decreased to 0.039 (0.018-0.071) ml (100 g min)-1, but before 3 months after reconstruction CFR increased to normal values 0.061 (0.037-0.071) ml (100 g min)-1. The explanation offered for the reduced CFR before and immediately after arterial reconstruction is temporary thrombosis in the smallest distributing arteries and in the arterioles resulting in heterogeneous flow distribution and decreased fluid filtration in poorly perfused segments of the capillary bed. The results speak against increased capillary filtration as the aetiology of the post-reconstructive oedema.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jens H. Eickhoff (1984) conducted an observational in Occlusive arterial disease (n=31). Occlusive arterial disease and arterial reconstruction vs. Normal limbs was evaluated on Capillary filtration rate (CFR) (p=0.01). Capillary filtration rate was significantly lower in limbs with occlusive arterial disease compared to normal limbs (0.049 vs 0.061 ml/100g/min; P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: