Key result
Electrochemical immunosensors and genosensors offer rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective alternatives to conventional diagnostic tests for the detection of Hepatitis C virus.
Electrochemical biosensors offer a promising, rapid, and cost-effective alternative to conventional diagnostic tests for the detection and monitoring of Hepatitis C virus.
May support point-of-care HCV testing; leaves open prospective clinical validation before practice change.
Hepatitis C is a liver disease that is transmitted through contact with the blood of an infected person. An estimated 150 million individuals worldwide have been chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Hepatitis C shows significant genetic variation in the global population, due to the high rate of viral RNA mutation. There are six variants of the virus (HCV genotypes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6), with 15 recorded subtypes that vary in prevalence across different regions of the world. A variety of devices are used to diagnose hepatitis C, including HCV antibody test, HCV viral load test, HCV genotype test and liver biopsy. Rapid, inexpensive, sensitive, and robust analytical devices are therefore essential for effective diagnosis and monitoring of disease treatment. This review provides an overview of current electrochemical immunosensor and genosensor technologies employed in HCV detection. There are a limited number of publications showing electrochemical biosensors being used for the detection of HCV. Due to their simplicity, specificity, and reliability, electrochemical biosensor devices have potential clinical applications in several viral infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carolina Venturini Uliana (2014) conducted a review in Hepatitis C. Electrochemical immunosensors and genosensors vs. Conventional diagnostic tests was evaluated. Electrochemical immunosensors and genosensors offer rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective alternatives to conventional diagnostic tests for the detection of Hepatitis C virus.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: