Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 21, 2012Journal of Periodontology

Evaluation of Human Recession Defects Treated With Coronally Advanced Flaps and Either Enamel Matrix Derivative or Connective Tissue: Comparison of Clinical Parameters at 10 Years

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ESE. Todd ScheyerPerio Health ProfessionalsMNMartha E. NunnUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Scheyer et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9a84aa262e4da96990b29chttps://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.110373
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clinical Evaluation of Acellular Allograft Dermis for the Treatment of Human Gingival Recession2001 · 245 citations
  2. 2Root Coverage With a Coronally Positioned Flap Used in Combination With Enamel Matrix Derivative: 18‐Month Clinical Evaluation2006 · 107 citations
  3. 3Human Histologic Evaluation of Root Coverage Obtained With a Connective Tissue With Partial Thickness Double Pedicle Graft. A Case Report1999 · 77 citations
  4. 4Root Coverage Using the Coronally Positioned Flap With or Without a Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft2004 · 190 citations
  5. 5Fourteen-year outcomes of coronally advanced flap for root coverage: follow-up from a randomized trial2011 · 77 citations