Key result
A Khorana score of ≥ 3 was significantly associated with a higher risk of cancer-associated thrombosis at baseline (OR 7.01) among Malaysian patients with solid organ cancers.
Why the study?
Data on cancer-associated thrombosis and its associated risk factors within diverse ethnic groups, such as the Malaysian population, remain limited.
Cohort (n=250)
Yes
In a multi-ethnic Malaysian cohort with solid organ cancers, the 6-month incidence of cancer-associated thrombosis was 12%, and the Khorana score was a significant predictor of risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Characterizes CAT incidence and risk factors in Malaysian cancer patients; extends limited ethnic data but remains hypothesis-generating.
BACKGROUND: Patients with solid organ cancers are at increased risk of developing cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), a complication driven by a complex interplay of patient-specific factors, cancer characteristics, and treatment modalities. Data on CAT and its associated risk factors within diverse ethnic groups, such as the Malaysian population, remains limited. This observational, cohort study aimed to address this gap by determining the incidence of CAT and identifying associated risk factors among multi-ethnic Malaysian patients with solid organ cancers. METHODS: This study included solid organ cancer patients aged ≥ 18 who attended HCTM and HKL from May 2022 to August 2023. The baseline demographics, and clinical characteristics, were acquired at the cancer diagnosis. Data on cancer treatment, thrombotic events and anticoagulation therapy during the study and its treatment were documented. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent factors associated with CAT in solid organ cancer. RESULTS: /L and Khorana score ≥ 3 had significantly higher risks of CAT at baseline. Stage IV disease, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, namely platinum-based chemotherapy and antimetabolites were associated with CAT during follow-up. The ROC analysis showed that the KRS significantly predicted CAT (area under the curve, 0.701 (95%CI: 0.594-0.808, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the prevalence of CAT at baseline and the incidence of CAT during follow-up, similar to other studies. Patients' clinical characteristics were associated with CAT at baseline while disease and treatment factors were associated with CAT at follow-up. These findings emphasise the need for targeted thromboprophylaxis in high-risk populations and highlight the importance of risk stratification tools such as the Khorana score for optimal patient management. Future studies involving larger patient cohorts and longer study duration would be beneficial. These findings provide valuable insights to inform clinical decision-making, optimise patient outcomes, and minimise potential risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abbas et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Solid organ cancers (n=250). Khorana score ≥ 3 vs. Khorana score < 3 was evaluated on Cancer-associated thrombosis at baseline (OR 7.01, 95% CI 2.05-23.96, p=0.002). A Khorana score of ≥ 3 was significantly associated with a higher risk of cancer-associated thrombosis at baseline (OR 7.01) among Malaysian patients with solid organ cancers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: