Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study evaluates survival outcomes in cancer-associated thrombosis patients, suggesting key predictors.
e24127 Background: Cancer significantly increases the risk of thrombosis. Recent advances in cancer treatment may have led to more cases of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). CAT is linked with substantial morbidity and mortality. Methods: This study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of patients with CAT at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH), a tertiary hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A single-center institution-based retrospective study was done on 274 patients with CAT. A structured, original data abstraction tool was used to extract data from patients' medical records. Bivariate and multivariate binary logistic regression were used to determine factors associated with 1-year mortality. Results: The median (interquartile range (IQR)) age of the patients was 48 (18-87) years, and 183 (66.8%) of them were female. 106 (38.7%) of the patients had at least one comorbidity. The median (IQR) values for the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Khorana Risk Score were 5.5 (2.0-7.0) and 1 (0-2), respectively. Gynecological malignancies were the most common cancers associated with thrombosis (29.1%), followed by hematological malignancies (24.4%) and intra-abdominal malignancies (18.2%). The three most common types of thrombosis identified were deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (72.6%), pulmonary embolism (PE) (10.9%), and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (10.9%). The most frequently utilized anticoagulant was rivaroxaban (40.1%), followed by warfarin (38.0%). The one-year overall survival rate was 81%, and higher Khorana Risk Score (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17-2.07; p = 0.003) and having solid organ malignancies (AOR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.10-8.07; P = 0.032) were significantly associated with increased 1-year mortality. Conclusions: In this cohort, the one-year survival rate for patients with CAT was higher than previously reported in regional studies. The Khorana Risk Score and the type of malignancy were significant predictors of survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abebe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: