Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose Outcomes with bispecific T-cell engagers (TCEs) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are heterogeneous. A practical tool to guide prognosis is needed. We developed a model integrating clinical, biological, and treatment-related variables to predict progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)- or G-protein–coupled receptor class 5 member D-directed TCEs. Methods We evaluated outcomes of 577 BCMA-directed and 366 talquetamab treatments across 15 US Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium centers. Variables significantly associated with inferior PFS in a multivariate Cox model were incorporated into a prognostic score and validated in an independent multicenter International Myeloma Foundation cohort. Results With a median follow-up of 8.4 months, the median PFS was 6.4 months (7.0 months for BCMA TCE; 6.1 months for talquetamab); 92% of patients were triple-class-refractory. Six variables significantly associated with inferior PFS—high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) [del(17p) or ≥2 HRCAs], hyperferritinemia (≥600 ng/mL), anemia (hemoglobin <9 g/dL), early relapse (<18 months from frontline therapy), general performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≥2), and exposure to prior BCMA-directed therapy—were combined to form the CHARGE index, stratifying patients into three risk groups. The median PFS was 21.8 months (95% CI, 11.7 to not reached), 7.1 months (95% CI, 6.1 to 10.1), and 1.6 months (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.5) in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively; hazard ratios (HRs) were 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5 to 2.7) and 4.8 (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.7) for intermediate- and high-risk versus low-risk groups. External validation (n = 173) showed that the median PFS was not reached, 7.0 months, and 3.0 months, with corresponding HRs of 2.9 (95% CI, 1.7 to 4.9) and 4.8 (95% CI, 2.6 to 8.7). Conclusion The CHARGE index provides a simplified and externally validated framework for predicting treatment outcomes in patients with RRMM receiving TCEs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zanwar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: