Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Literature review reveals determinants of private equity performance across corporate firms, indicating value creation depends on specific agency and contracting frictions.
We review the evidence on the impact of private equity (PE) ownership on firms, stakeholders, and the economy. We organize this literature using a framework that emphasizes the costs and benefits of PE as an ownership form and implies five main predictions: (i) only some firms are natural PE targets; (ii) PE ownership is optimally temporary; (iii) debt is typically a cheaper source of capital than PE equity; (iv) PE activity is strongly cyclical; and (v) the PE model is a second-best response to underlying agency and contracting frictions. We use this framework to interpret existing evidence and to clarify when, and for whom, PE ownership creates value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strömberg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: