Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phase 1b trial demonstrates deep, durable responses with teclistamab plus daratumumab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, highlighting the need for infection management.
Teclistamab is the first approved B-cell maturation antigen×CD3 bispecific antibody with weight-based dosing for triple-class-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of teclistamab combined with the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab in the phase 1b TRIMM-2 study. Eligible patients had RRMM (≥3 prior lines of therapy [LOT] or were double-refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug); prior anti-CD38 exposure was permitted. Patients received subcutaneous daratumumab per approved schedule plus weight-based or fixed-dose subcutaneous teclistamab. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR). Progression-free survival (PFS) was an exploratory endpoint. Sixty-one patients received the weight-based recommended phase 2 doses (RP2D; teclistamab 1.5 mg/kg QW or 3.0 mg/kg Q2W); median number of prior LOTs was 5 (range, 1-14). Median follow-up was 12.0-months. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were infections, cytokine release syndrome, neutropenia, and anemia; grade 3/4 TEAEs occurred in 93.4% and 7 died from TEAEs. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. ORR was 68.9% (complete response or better, 44.3%); median DOR was not reached. Median PFS was 26.3 months. A cohort exploring fixed-dose teclistamab (100-300 mg) ended prematurely after a safety signal for fatal infections was identified; out of an abundance of caution, all patients were switched to weight-based dosing. In conclusion, the fully immune-based combination of weight-based RP2D teclistamab plus daratumumab demonstrated deep and durable responses, with a well-characterized safety profile. Results highlight the importance of infection management, including early immunoglobulin replacement. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04108195.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodríguez‐Otero et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: