Methodological study evaluates reliability estimates for smartphone-derived machine-learning scores of fluid reasoning, highlighting framework needs for digital behavioral assessment.
Psychological assessment increasingly extends beyond standardized testing situations to behavioral data collected in everyday life. Machine-learning models can be trained on behavioral features derived from smartphone records to predict individual differences in psychological traits. However, only a few studies in this field evaluate psychometric quality of ML-based scores beyond convergent validity (predictive accuracy). Smartphone sensing data consist of large sets of behavioral features that are not constructed according to a theory-driven measurement model, and there is currently no established standard for quantifying reliability in this context. This project aims to compare several partition-based reliability estimates for ML-based fluid reasoning scores derived from smartphone data, investiges the effect of temporal distance between data partitions, and examines how the different reliability estimates relate to predictive accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Apel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: