Interpretation Portability Across Bounded Historical Objects

This is a conceptual permission paper. Wong (2026a) requires that interpretation not enlarge or silently merge its source object. This paper supplies the second clause: instantiating a labelled claim on another recovered object requires a separate permission. Comparability does not entail that permission: C=1 does not imply Pi=1. The demonstration is a minimal contrast (same pair, both C=1): T2 content/template Pi=0 versus T3 form instantiation on the receiving object's own notice Pi=1. K2 = K_form and K_compat and K_evidence names three independent failure modes, so Pi=0 is diagnosable. I^(3) is reserved in v1.0 by freeze. No portability reader round is reported. T7a/T7b illustrate; they are not Application 1. Document ID: ATACTON-WP-PRT-001. Companion: Recovering Bounded Historical Objects (ATACTON-WP-REC-001), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22260164. Follow-up to Wong (2026a), A Bounded Archival Framework for Constructing Football-Linked Market Regimes, Version 1.6, SSRN 7353342 (https://ssrn.com/abstract=7353342).