Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review uncovers spatiotemporal signaling pathways driving congenital scoliosis in embryonic development, highlighting an evidence-grading framework for genetic diagnosis and clinical counseling.
Congenital scoliosis and congenital vertebral malformations arise from heterogeneous disruptions of vertebral segmentation and formation, leading to a highly variable clinical morphology and associated anomalies. Over the past decade (2015–2025), human genetics and developmental biology have clarified core etiologic pathways, particularly somitogenesis/segmentation clock–wavefront signaling and TBX6-associated congenital scoliosis, while supporting multi-factorial contributions in many apparently sporadic cases. This review integrates morphology with spatiotemporal embryologic windows, linking axial patterning (e.g. RA–HOX context), epigenetic regulation, segmentation clock signaling (Notch/WNT/FGF), and downstream tissue-scale effectors to vertebral segmentation defects and three-dimensional curve phenotypes. We propose an evidence-grading scheme (levels A–D) to differentiate well-supported mechanisms and clinically actionable genetic findings from emerging hypotheses and preclinical signals. The synthesis highlights practical implications for molecular diagnosis and variant interpretation, phenotype-informed test selection, and counseling, while outlining priority directions for resolving non-coding/structural variation, gene–environment interactions, and mechanistic validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: