Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative study reveals how survivor-led museums affirm dignity and provide non-legal justice for care-leavers, indicating justice is continually evaluated beyond formal state processes.
How is justice experienced beyond formal legal processes? Socio-legal scholarship on institutional child abuse has concentrated on state responses – inquiries, apologies and redress – while cultural practices that sustain recognition after these conclude have received less attention. Where museums have been examined, the focus has been on state-led initiatives and public memory rather than on how those whose histories they commemorate evaluate them. This article takes up this question through the Australian Orphanage Museum, a memory project founded and run by Care-leavers. Drawing on interviews and focus groups, it situates survivor-led commemoration within victim-centred scholarship that conceptualises justice as evaluative, relational and socially situated. It argues that when authored and governed by those directly affected, museums function as dignity-affirming sites of non-legal justice. Rather than delivering a finite outcome, they endure as sites through which justice is continually evaluated, and authority over the public narration of institutional harm reconfigured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dave McDonald (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: