Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical note reveals complex-geometric obstructions to minimal real generalized trisecants in projective varieties, highlighting the need to restrict admissible numerical triples.
Ranestad, Seigal, and Wang asked whether, for every admissible triple (d,n,m)(d,n,m), there exists a smooth, irreducible, non-degenerate real projective variety of dimension mm, codimension nn, and degree dd, whose maximum number of real points in a transverse complementary linear section is the minimal value n+1n+1. This note observes that the question has a negative answer as stated. Proposition 2.8(2) of Jinhyung Park’s small-degree theorem excludes the underlying complex varieties for the infinite family (d,n,m)=(n+3,n,m),n≥2,m≥n+2.(d,n,m)=(n+3,n,m), n≥2, m≥ n+2. Indeed, Park’s result requires d≥2n+2d≥2n+2 in this range, contradicting d=n+3d=n+3. The smallest resulting counterexample to universal existence is (d,n,m)=(5,2,4)(d,n,m)=(5,2,4). The obstruction is complex-geometric and arises before the condition on real complementary linear sections is considered. A revised formulation of the open problem, restricted to numerical triples for which an appropriate smooth complex projective variety exists, is proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeraoulia Rafik (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: