Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review demonstrates a hybrid satellite radar framework in bridge networks, highlighting scalable integration of physics-based and data-driven models.
Multi-Temporal Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (MT-InSAR) has matured into a credible, non-contact technique for monitoring bridge deformation from individual structures to regional portfolios. The main challenge for routine engineering use is no longer measuring millimetre-scale line-of-sight (LOS) displacement, but interpreting those measurements into defensible statements about structural condition. This review addresses that interpretation problem by synthesising the physical and algorithmic fundamentals of MT-InSAR, bridge-typology-dependent applicability, LOS projection ambiguity, current sensor capabilities, and emerging open data services. Particular emphasis is placed on signal decoupling because measured bridge displacement combines reversible thermal response, transient live-load effects, progressive deformation associated with damage or settlement, and measurement noise. Two complementary interpretation strategies are examined: physics-based integration using finite-element analysis, model updating and digital twins, and data-driven integration using clustering, anomaly detection, forecasting and deep learning. Their convergence through physics-informed methods is also discussed. The review proposes a hybrid framework in which data-driven methods screen bridge portfolios and identify anomalous deformation, while physics-based modelling provides structural interpretation and supports validation using inspection records, in-situ measurements and uncertainty quantification. The synthesis highlights the strengths and limitations of current practice and identifies research needs in multi-geometry analysis, dense spatial sampling, physics-informed learning, portfolio-scale digital twins and prospective validation. The resulting framework is intended to support scalable, physically interpretable and evidence-based use of MT-InSAR in bridge structural health monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: