Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We reviewed the medical records of 175 patients who were admitted between 1977 and 1984 with a diagnosis of traumatic hyphema to define the incidence of operative intervention for the treatment of complications related to rebleeding. Of the 156 patients admitted with primary hyphemas, 25 (16%) rebled during hospitalization. Seven of these 25 in-hospital rebleeds required surgical intervention. Nineteen other patients were admitted with ocular histories and examinations strongly suggestive of rebleeding prior to admission (secondary hyphema--presumed preadmission rebleed). Seven of these 19 eyes underwent surgery. Of the 175 eyes studied, only one eye that did not rebleed underwent surgery during the initial hospitalization. Fourteen (32%) of 44 eyes that rebled underwent operative intervention. Nine of these 14 patients were operated on under general anesthesia. Potential benefits of newer hyphema treatments, such as epsilon-aminocaproic acid, designed to prevent rebleeding should be weighed against not only the ocular risks of rebleeding but also the risks of general anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: