Key result
Simulated vaccination during pregnancy with 70% effective coverage is projected to reduce the birth prevalence of congenital CMV by 71.4% over 20 years.
Why the study?
Cytomegalovirus causes high disease burden, particularly in congenitally infected infants and immunocompromised individuals, prompting evaluation of vaccines under development.
Do vaccination strategies or hygiene interventions reduce the incidence of congenital CMV and overall CMV burden in a modeled population?
Do vaccination strategies or hygiene interventions reduce the incidence of congenital CMV and overall CMV burden in a modeled population?
Effect estimate: 71.4% reduction (95% CI 71.0-71.9)
Mathematical modeling suggests that vaccinating pregnant women or women of reproductive age against CMV could substantially reduce the burden of congenital CMV over a 20-year horizon.
Modeling supports targeting reproductive-age women to cut cCMV; leaves optimal strategies and real-world impact open pending trials.
BACKGROUND: Infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV) is highly prevalent worldwide and can cause severe disease in immunocompromised persons and congenitally infected infants. The disease burden caused by congenital CMV infection is high, especially in resource-limited countries. Vaccines are currently under development for various target groups. METHODS: We evaluated the impact of vaccination strategies and hygiene intervention using transmission models. Model parameters were estimated from a cross-sectional serological population study (n=5179) and a retrospective birth cohort (n=31,484), providing information on the age- and sex-specific CMV prevalence and on the birth prevalence of congenital CMV (cCMV). RESULTS: The analyses show that vertical transmission and infectious reactivation are the main drivers of transmission. Vaccination strategies aimed at reducing transmission from mother to child (vaccinating pregnant women or women of reproductive age) can yield substantial reductions of cCMV in 20 years (31.7-71.4% if 70% of women are effectively vaccinated). Alternatively, hygiene intervention aimed at preventing CMV infection and re-infection of women of reproductive age from young children is expected to reduce cCMV by less than 2%. The effects of large-scale vaccination on CMV prevalence can be substantial, owing to the moderate transmissibility of CMV at the population level. However, as CMV causes lifelong infection, the timescale on which reductions in CMV prevalence are expected is in the order of several decades. Elimination of CMV infection in the long run is only feasible for a vaccine with a long duration of protection and high vaccination coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination is an effective intervention to reduce the birth prevalence of cCMV. Population-level reductions in CMV prevalence can only be achieved on a long timescale. Our results stress the value of vaccinating pregnant women and women of childbearing age and provide support for the development of CMV vaccines and early planning of vaccination scenarios and rollouts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rozhnova et al. (2020) studied Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (n=36,663). CMV vaccination (simulated) vs. No intervention was evaluated on Reduction in the birth prevalence of congenital CMV (cCMV) (71.4% reduction, 95% CI 71.0-71.9). Simulated vaccination during pregnancy with 70% effective coverage is projected to reduce the birth prevalence of congenital CMV by 71.4% over 20 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: