Key result
Moiré topography screening for structural scoliosis revealed twice as many cases as conventional screening, demonstrating high sensitivity (0.997) but yielding many false positive results.
Why the study?
Does moiré topography improve the detection of structural scoliosis compared to conventional clinical screening in schoolgirls?
Cross-Sectional
Does moiré topography improve the detection of structural scoliosis compared to conventional clinical screening in schoolgirls?
Moiré topography is highly sensitive for scoliosis screening in schoolgirls but yields many false positives and does not correlate with radiographic severity.
May increase scoliosis detection in schoolgirls but risks excess false positives; leaves open its screening role pending validation.
Schoolgirls, aged 10-17 years, were screened for structural scoliosis at school using both conventional clinical screening with a forward bending test and moiré topography. Those suspected of having scoliosis were examined in an orthopaedic clinic for the presence of clinically significant scoliosis, defined as lateral deviation of 10 degrees or more measured according to Cobb. The screening revealed 41 cases of scoliosis, corresponding to a prevalence of 4.1 per cent. In 39 girls the scoliosis had not been recognized previously. In this study moiré topography revealed twice as many cases of scoliosis as did conventional clinical screening. The diagnostic sensitivity of moiré topography proved to be high (0.997). The method is, however, loaded by many false positive results. No correlation between the degree of lateral deviation, judged by X-ray examination, and the difference in contour lines, judged by moiré topography, was found.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laulund et al. (1982) conducted a cross-sectional in Structural scoliosis. Moiré topography vs. Conventional clinical screening with a forward bending test was evaluated on Clinically significant scoliosis (lateral deviation of ≥10 degrees). Moiré topography screening for structural scoliosis revealed twice as many cases as conventional screening, demonstrating high sensitivity (0.997) but yielding many false positive results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: