PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 4, 2007Heart66 citations

Digitalis: a dangerous drug in atrial fibrillation? An analysis of the SPORTIF III and V data

View Full Paper
KGKnut GjesdalJFJan FeyziSOS. Bertil Olsson

Key Result

Digitalis use in patients with atrial fibrillation was associated with increased mortality compared to non-users (adjusted HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.22 to 1.92; p<0.001).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=7,329)

Multicenter

Yes

PICO

P
Population
7,329 patients with atrial fibrillation at moderate-to-high risk of thromboembolism from the SPORTIF III and V studies.
E
Exposure / Comparator
Digitalis vs Non-users of digitalis
O
Primary Outcome
Mortality — HR 1.53 (1.22 to 1.92), p=<0.001

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 1.53 (95% CI 1.22–1.92)

Absolute Event Rate: 6.5% vs 4.1%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Patients were not randomised with respect to digitalis use

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In heart failure, digitalis increases exercise capacity and reduces morbidity, but has no effect on survival. This raises the suspicion that the inotropic benefits of digitalis may be counteracted by serious adverse effects. Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were studied to clarify this. DESIGN: In the Stroke Prevention using an ORal Thrombin Inhibitor in atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF) III and V studies, 7329 patients with AF at moderate-to-high risk were randomised to preventive treatment of thromboembolism, either with warfarin or the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran. The survival of users and non-users of digitalis was investigated. RESULTS: At baseline, 53.4% of the study population used digitalis, and these patients had a higher mortality than non-users (255/3911 (6.5%) vs 141/3418 (4.1%), p<0.001; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.58 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.94)). Digitalis users also had more baseline risk factors. After multivariate risk factor adjustment, the increased mortality persisted (p<0.001; HR = 1.53 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.92 vs 1.23 to 1.92)). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that digitalis, like other inotropic drugs, may increase mortality. This may be concealed in heart failure, but be revealed in patients with AF, who need the rate-reducing effect of digitalis, but do not benefit much from an increased inotropy. Cautious interpretation of the data is mandatory since the patients were not randomised with respect to digitalis use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gjesdal et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=7,329). Digitalis vs. Non-users of digitalis was evaluated on Mortality (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.92, p=<0.001). Digitalis use in patients with atrial fibrillation was associated with increased mortality compared to non-users (adjusted HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.22 to 1.92; p<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9a8befe1568289de8de11fhttps://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006.108399
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper