Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study addresses the development of active and intelligent food packaging as a sustainable alternative to petroleum-based plastics. The innovation lies in the eco-friendly biosynthesis of tricobalt tetroxide nanoparticles (Co 3 O 4 -NPs) by green synthesis route using Ginkgo biloba extract, thereby eliminating harsh reagents, and in the comparison of two methods for incorporating Co 3 O 4 -NPs into a polycaprolactone (PCL) matrix (i.e., direct electrospinning and immersion) at concentrations of 5% and 10% by weight. Regarding methodology, the materials were analyzed using structural, mechanical, ecological, and microbiological techniques. Mechanical results indicated that incorporating 5% Co 3 O 4 -NPs by electrospinning refined the fibers and acted as a reinforcement, significantly increasing tensile strength, elasticity, and ductility. In contrast, the 10% Co 3 O 4 -NPs concentration resulted in agglomeration and a loss of mechanical performance. Additionally, UV radiation tests showed that films with 5% Co 3 O 4 -NPs underwent accelerated degradation, whereas those with 10% Co 3 O 4 -NPs protected the PCL. Regarding biocompatibility, VERO cell tests confirmed the biological safety of the PCL@Co 3 O 4 -NPs. Notably, the potential disposal of PCL@Co 3 O 4 -NPs proved safe: no seed phytotoxicity was observed, and soil tests demonstrated safe degradation with controlled cobalt release. From a microbiological perspective, the PCL@Co 3 O 4 -NPs inhibited pathogen formation, significantly reducing P. aeruginosa biofilm, particularly at the 10% Co 3 O 4 -NPs concentration. Therefore, the formulation with 5% Co 3 O 4 -NPs is the most promising and balanced alternative, as it optimizes mechanical performance, biocompatibility, and sustainable degradation for active packaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SILVEIRA et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: