Key result
Preoperative right bundle branch block was associated with a more than five-fold increased risk of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI (OR 5.19; 95% CI 1.99-13.56; P=0.001).
Why the study?
Predictors for permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation needed to be identified.
Cohort (n=431)
No
Odds Ratio: 5.19 (95% CI 1.99–13.56)
p-value: p=0.001
Pre-existing right bundle branch block, use of a self-expandable prosthesis, and a history of syncope are significant predictors for the need of a permanent pacemaker following TAVI.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to identify clinical, electrocardiographic (ECG) and procedural predictors for permanent pacemaker (PPM) requirement after transaortic valve implantation (TAVI).METHODS: All consecutive patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (SSAS) undergoing TAVI at our single center were included in the study and prospectively followed. All patients had standard 12-leads ECGs recordings before and after TAVI and continuous ECG monitoring during hospital stay. Primary endpoint was to identify electrocardiographic predictors of PPM implantation after TAVI; secondary endpoint was to ascertain other clinical or procedure-related predictive factors of PPM need. PPM implantation was further arbitrarily divided into early and late one (beyond the 3rd day).RESULTS: Among the 431 patients undergoing TAVI between 2008 and 2018, 77 (18%) needed PPM implantation; 47 (11%) had an early procedure, and 30 (7%) a late implant. Preoperative right bundle branch block (RBBB) implies more than five-fold increase of the risk of PPM implantation (OR 5.19, CI 1.99-13.56, P=0.001), whereas the use of a self-expandable prosthesis is associated with an almost three-fold increase of the risk (OR 2.60, CI 1.28-5.28, P=0.008). In the late PPM implantation subgroup, only the history of syncope retains a significant association with such an increased risk (OR 2.71, CI 1.09-6.75, P=0.032).CONCLUSIONS: The need of a PPM in the individual TAVI patient is hardly predictable. However, the finding of pre-existing RBBB, the use of self-expandable prosthesis and history of syncope can individuate patients at increased risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Errigo et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (n=431). Preoperative right bundle branch block (RBBB) vs. Absence of RBBB was evaluated on Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after TAVI (OR 5.19, 95% CI 1.99-13.56, p=0.001). Preoperative right bundle branch block was associated with a more than five-fold increased risk of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI (OR 5.19; 95% CI 1.99-13.56; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: