Key result
Anterior and posterior wall longitudinal strain were significantly decreased in large compared to small abdominal aortic aneurysms, with ALS showing strong diagnostic value for large AAA (AUC 0.82).
Why the study?
Abdominal aortic aneurysm is a dangerous vascular disease, and non-invasive 2D STI plays an important role in assessing aortic biomechanical properties across different aneurysm sizes.
Does two-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging (2D STI) accurately evaluate biomechanical properties and differentiate between large and small abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Observational (n=91)
Does two-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging (2D STI) accurately evaluate biomechanical properties and differentiate between large and small abdominal aortic aneurysms?
p-value: p=<.05
Longitudinal strain measured by 2D speckle-tracking ultrasound can evaluate the biomechanical properties of AAA walls and provides strong diagnostic value in distinguishing between small and large aneurysms.
Speckle-tracking strain differentiates large from small AAAs; leaves open its value for rupture prediction or management decisions.
OBJECTIVES: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a dangerous and lethal vascular disease. Non-invasive two-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging (2D STI) plays an important role in assessing aortic biomechanical properties. Our study aimed to evaluate the alterations of biomechanical characteristics using 2D STI in 91 AAA patients with different size. METHODS: Aneurysm strain, elastic modulus, stiffness index β, and aortic distensibility determined by M-Mode ultrasound (US), and longitudinal strain (LS) derived from 2D STI were compared in 40 large AAA patients (diameter ≥ 55 mm) and 51 small AAA patients (diameter < 55 mm). RESULTS: Compared with small AAA group, anterior wall longitudinal strain (ALS) and posterior wall longitudinal strain (PLS) were significantly decreased in large AAA group (all P < .05) and not affected by age, symptom, hypertension, and thrombus. Meanwhile, ALS and PLS correlated negatively with maximal aneurysm diameters (r = -0.628 and -0.469, respectively, all P < .001). And only ALS was associated with M-Mode US parameters (all P < .05). Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, ALS and PLS had strong diagnostic values for large AAA with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 and 0.72, and cut-off points of 1.71 and 1.64% with a sensitivity of 78 and 72%, and a specificity of 75 and 70%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LS measured by 2D STI could evaluate the biomechanical properties of aneurysm wall with different size, and add additional diagnostic value in distinguishing between small and large AAA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ning et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=91). Large abdominal aortic aneurysm (diameter ≥ 55 mm) vs. Small abdominal aortic aneurysm (diameter < 55 mm) was evaluated on Anterior wall longitudinal strain (ALS) and posterior wall longitudinal strain (PLS) (p=<.05). Anterior and posterior wall longitudinal strain were significantly decreased in large compared to small abdominal aortic aneurysms, with ALS showing strong diagnostic value for large AAA (AUC 0.82).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: