Key result
M-TAPA was not superior to OSTAPB for improving quality of recovery on postoperative day 1 in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Why the study?
Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through a perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) provides a wide analgesic range, but its quality of recovery compared with oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (OSTAPB) for total laparoscopic hysterectomy required examination.
Does M-TAPA improve quality of recovery compared to OSTAPB in female patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy?
RCT (n=40)
randomized
Does M-TAPA improve quality of recovery compared to OSTAPB in female patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy?
M-TAPA may not be superior to OSTAPB for improving quality of recovery in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
M-TAPA confers no QoR advantage over OSTAPB; does not support preferential adoption of this block after laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through a perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) provides a wide analgesic range. Herein, we examined the quality of recovery (QoR) of M-TAPA for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) compared with oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (OSTAPB) and measured plasma levobupivacaine concentrations (PClevo). Forty female patients undergoing TLH were randomized to each group. Nerve blocks were performed bilaterally with 25 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine administered per side. The primary outcome was changes in QoR-15 scores on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2 from the preoperative baseline. The main secondary outcomes were PClevo at 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after performing nerve block. Group differences (M-TAPA—OSTAPB) in mean changes from baseline in QoR-15 scores on POD 1 and 2 were −11.3 (95% confidence interval (CI), −24.9 to 2.4, p = 0.104; standard deviation (SD), 22.8) and −7.0 (95% CI, −20.5 to 6.6, p = 0.307; SD, 18.7), respectively. Changes in PClevo were similar in both groups. The post hoc analysis using Bayesian statistics revealed that posterior probabilities of M-TAPA being clinically more effective than OSTAPB were up to 22.4 and 24.4% for POD 1 and 2, respectively. In conclusion, M-TAPA may not be superior to OSTAPB for TLH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuka et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in total laparoscopic hysterectomy (n=40). Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through a perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) vs. oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (OSTAPB) was evaluated on changes in QoR-15 scores on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2 from the preoperative baseline (MD -11.3, 95% CI -24.9 to 2.4, p=0.104). M-TAPA was not superior to OSTAPB for improving quality of recovery on postoperative day 1 in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: