Key result
Recumbent bicycle exercise significantly reduced the rate pressure product compared to upright exercise immediately after exertion (104.8 vs 151.8 mmHg×beats/min×10^-2, P<0.01) in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the safety and efficiency of recumbent bicycle ergometer exercise by evaluating heart rate variability and hemodynamic variables in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Does recumbent bicycle exercise improve safety and efficiency by reducing myocardial workload compared to upright bicycle exercise in patients with atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=13)
Open-label
Randomized crossover
No
Does recumbent bicycle exercise improve safety and efficiency by reducing myocardial workload compared to upright bicycle exercise in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Recumbent bicycle exercise reduces myocardial workload compared to upright exercise without compromising autonomic nervous system activation, suggesting it is a safer and efficient modality for cardiac rehabilitation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Recumbent exercise appears feasible in small AF cohort; leaves open whether it improves safety or HRV versus upright positioning.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficiency of recumbent bicycle ergometer exercise by observing heart rate variability (HRV) and hemodynamic variables in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods: In a balanced crossover study, 13 patients with atrial fibrillation (mean age, 62.25.3 years) were asked to perform a bicycle exercise twice, once in the upright position and once in the recumbent position at an angle of 30, with a 1-week interval between both. The exercise intensity was set initially at 10 W and increased by 15 W every 2 minutes up to 70 W. HRV and hemodynamic variables were measured. All data were analyzed using one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: Low-frequency normalization in HRV was increased with no intergroup differences immediately after exercise. The rate pressure product was significantly lower in the recumbent than in the upright position right after exercise (104.814.3 vs. 151.851.4 mmHgbeats/min10 -2 , P<0.01). Conclusions: Recumbent exercise improves the safety and efficiency of cardiac rehabilitation for atrial fibrillation patients by reducing myocardial workload without compromising the activation of the autonomic nervous system that regulates cardiac activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=13). Recumbent bicycle ergometer exercise vs. Upright bicycle ergometer exercise was evaluated on Rate pressure product (RPP) immediately after exercise (p=<0.01). Recumbent bicycle exercise significantly reduced the rate pressure product compared to upright exercise immediately after exertion (104.8 vs 151.8 mmHg×beats/min×10^-2, P<0.01) in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: