Key result
Original assignment to interferon beta-1a resulted in 29.1% of patients reaching an EDSS >= 6.0 at 8 years, compared to 42.0% of original placebo patients (an observed treatment effect of ~30%).
Why the study?
Does interferon beta-1a reduce long-term disability progression in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis?
Cohort (n=172)
Does interferon beta-1a reduce long-term disability progression in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Long-term follow-up of relapsing MS patients suggests that interferon beta-1a reduces the proportion of patients reaching severe disability compared to placebo, with estimation methods based on trial progression rates providing plausible predictions.
Two methods were used to estimate the long-term impact of disease-modifying drug therapy (DMDT) in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) who completed a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of interferon beta-1a (IFNbeta-1a). The study cohort consisted of patients with ambulatory relapsing MS who had previously participated in a placebo-controlled clinical trial for two years. At its end, patients were managed in an unstructured fashion by their neurologists and re-evaluated at an average of 6.1 years after the end of the trial. Follow-up evaluation was obtained for 93% of the 172 eligible patients. Because study inclusion criteria required that all patients have an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of < or = 3.5 at entry, disability progression at follow-up was defined as EDSS > or = 6.0. Two methods were used to estimate the expected proportions that reached EDSS > or = 6.0 at follow-up. Estimates were compared with observed proportions. Method 1 used progression rates observed during the two-year phase III clinical trial and the percentage of time that patients were on DMDT during the follow-up period. Method 2 used progression rates from a natural history comparison group of relapsing-remitting MS patients. At the eight-year follow-up, 42.0% of the original placebo patients and 29.1% of the original IFNbeta-1a patients reached an EDSS > or = 6.0, an observed treatment effect of approximately 30%. Using method 1, it was estimated that 36.3% of the original placebo patients and 27.6% of the original IFNbeta-1a patients should have reached an EDSS > or = 6.0. Use of the natural history control group (method 2) predicted less plausible outcomes. Estimated proportions of patients reaching the endpoint were 63.3% for the original placebo group and 55.8% for the original IFNbeta-1a group. Treatment effect sizes of 75-90% would be required to match estimates from method 2 with the observed outcome. The paucity of data on the long-term treatment of patients with MS may be aided by applying these or similar methods to vigorously followed cohorts of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rudick et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Relapsing multiple sclerosis (n=172). Interferon beta-1a vs. Placebo was evaluated on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score >= 6.0. Original assignment to interferon beta-1a resulted in 29.1% of patients reaching an EDSS >= 6.0 at 8 years, compared to 42.0% of original placebo patients (an observed treatment effect of ~30%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: