Key result
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with a decreased incidence of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch compared to traditional surgical aortic valve replacement.
Why the study?
Does TAVR reduce the incidence of severe patient prosthesis mismatch compared to SAVR in high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Does TAVR reduce the incidence of severe patient prosthesis mismatch compared to SAVR in high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis?
TAVR reduces the incidence of severe patient prosthesis mismatch compared to SAVR in high-risk patients, which is clinically significant as severe PPM increases 1-year mortality.
Patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM) can occur when a prosthetic aortic valve has an effective orifice area (EOA) less than that of a native valve. A recent study by Zorn and colleagues evaluated the incidence and significance of PPM in high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis who were randomized to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). TAVR is associated with decreased incidence of severe PPM compared to traditional SAVR valves. Severe PPM increases risk for death at 1 year postoperatively in high risk patients. The increased incidence of PPM is largely due to differences in valve design and should encourage development of newer SAVR valves to reduce risk for PPM. In addition more vigorous approaches to root enlargement in small annulus should be performed with SAVR to prevent PPM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghanta et al. (2016) conducted an editorial in Severe aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was evaluated on Incidence of severe patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with a decreased incidence of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch compared to traditional surgical aortic valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: