This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The aims of this study were to establish a standardized preparation protocol and develop an improved formula for “thong ake,” a traditional Thai sweetened rice–egg yolk cake. The ingredients of the dessert consisted of blended rice flour and cassava starch (30%), coconut milk (30%), sugar (20%), and egg yolk (20%). The processing procedure comprised preparing sweetened condensed coconut milk and forming a soft dough via prolonged stirring of the warm mixture. In the standardized protocol, the evaporation temperature (70 °C) and total soluble solid of the concentrated sugar–coconut milk (65°Bx) were set. The heating–cooling temperature (55 °C to 75 °C to 55 °C) was developed for dough preparation. Resistant starch type 4 (RS4) and polyol were fortified to enhance dietary fiber and reduce the sugar content of the dessert, respectively. Up to 10% RS4 substitution of native starch/flour resulted in a decrease in the hardness, chewiness, and gumminess of the dessert ( p < 0.05). However, the overall acceptance score of the 10% RS4 formula was not different from that of the control ( p ≥ 0.05). This formula was selected for developing the reduced sugar version of the dessert, in which 25% sucrose was replaced by xylitol, maltitol, or sorbitol. RS4 and polyol had a slight effect on the dessert’s moisture content, a w , and color. However, that ingredient combination further decreased the hardness, chewiness, and gumminess of the dessert ( p < 0.05). The formula with 10% RS4 and 5% sorbitol obtained an overall consumer acceptance score similar to that without polyol ( p ≥ 0.05) and had the lowest ingredient cost. This most suitable formula yielded a dessert with 8.15% dietary fiber and 25% sugar reduction. The standardized protocol and improved formulation of thong ake used in this study could enhance quality control and the nutritional profile of the dessert.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chamnandee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: