Key result
A computed method for noninvasive MRI assessment of mean pulmonary arterial pressure strongly correlated with invasive catheterization (r = 0.92), with a mean absolute difference of 5.4 mmHg.
Why the study?
Does a computed method using MRI phase mapping accurately estimate pulmonary arterial pressure compared to right heart catheterization in patients undergoing catheterization?
Observational (n=31)
Does a computed method using MRI phase mapping accurately estimate pulmonary arterial pressure compared to right heart catheterization in patients undergoing catheterization?
Effect estimate: r = 0.92
A novel computed method combining MRI phase mapping with patient biophysical parameters provides an accurate noninvasive estimation of pulmonary arterial pressure compared to invasive catheterization.
The present method enables the noninvasive assessment of mean pulmonary arterial pressure from magnetic resonance phase mapping by computing both physical and biophysical parameters. The physical parameters include the mean blood flow velocity over the cross-sectional area of the main pulmonary artery (MPA) at the systolic peak and the maximal systolic MPA cross-sectional area value, whereas the biophysical parameters are related to each patient, such as height, weight, and heart rate. These parameters have been measured in a series of 31 patients undergoing right-side heart catheterization, and the computed mean pulmonary arterial pressure value (Ppa(Comp)) has been compared with the mean pressure value obtained from catheterization (Ppa(Cat)) in each patient. A significant correlation was found that did not differ from the identity line Ppa(Comp) = Ppa(Cat) (r = 0.92). The mean and maximal absolute differences between Ppa(Comp) and Ppa(Cat) were 5.4 and 11.9 mmHg, respectively. The method was also applied to compute the MPA systolic and diastolic pressures in the same patient series. We conclude that this computed method, which combines physical (whoever the patient) and biophysical parameters (related to each patient), improves the accuracy of MRI to noninvasively estimate pulmonary arterial pressures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laffon et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (n=31). Computed method for noninvasive MRI assessment vs. Right-side heart catheterization was evaluated on Correlation between computed and catheterization mean pulmonary arterial pressure (r = 0.92). A computed method for noninvasive MRI assessment of mean pulmonary arterial pressure strongly correlated with invasive catheterization (r = 0.92), with a mean absolute difference of 5.4 mmHg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: