Theoretical study demonstrates a 16-dimensional counterexample in pseudo-Riemannian geometry, indicating parallel nilpotent endomorphisms do not guarantee parallel null vectors.
We construct a closed complete flat pseudo-Riemannian manifold of dimension 16 and signature (8,8) carrying a nonzero parallel self-adjoint endomorphism N with N² = 0, although neither the manifold nor any connected double cover admits a nonzero parallel vector field. This gives a negative answer, as stated, to Question 12.0.3 in the Burns–Matveev list of open problems about geodesics. The construction starts with a compact flat Riemannian manifold whose holonomy has odd order and zero fixed space, doubles its Euclidean representation, equips the double with the split metric, and sets N(u,v) = (0,u). Odd-order holonomy survives every index-two subgroup. An explicit input is the free (ℤ/3ℤ)² quotient of an Eisenstein four-torus constructed by Bauer and Gleissner. We also show that when the top image of a parallel nilpotent has rank one, the manifold or its orientation double cover does carry a parallel null vector; in particular, the original question is affirmative in Lorentzian and co-Lorentzian signature. Research status: Unrefereed preprint released for independent mathematical scrutiny. Publication on Zenodo does not constitute peer review. AI-use disclosure: AI-assisted tools supported literature search, computation, proof auditing, and manuscript preparation. The author remains responsible for all claims and the final text.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alper Ferudun (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: