Qualitative study reveals complex beliefs and fears about heredity in families affected by orofacial clefts, indicating a critical need for accessible genetic counseling.
Objective To describe the perspectives and experiences of urban Latin American families impacted by orofacial clefts, with particular attention to how families understand genetics, heredity, and genetic testing. Design Qualitative investigation using thematic content analysis of semistructured interviews. Setting An interdisciplinary orofacial cleft care program at a pediatric hospital in Medellín, Colombia, providing long-term, family-centered cleft care. Patients, Participants Adult parents/caregivers representing 20 families ( N = 20) with at least 1 child receiving care for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Interventions In-person, semistructured interviews that were audio-recorded with oral informed consent. Main Outcome Measure(s) Interview domains included demographic characteristics, explanatory models of cleft conditions, perspectives related to genetics, and attitudes toward genetic testing. Results Families commonly identified multiple perceived causes of cleft formation, including maternal exposures, heredity/genetics, and divine intervention. Eighteen families (90%) described family relationships as their primary framework for understanding genetics. Fourteen families (70%) expressed fears related to heredity, frequently influencing family planning decisions. Only 5 families (25%) had accessed genetic testing or counseling, yet all families expressed interest in genetic testing if it were available. Conclusions Families integrated biomedical, environmental, and spiritual explanations into their understanding of cleft conditions. Genomic literacy and fears about heredity shaped family communication and reproductive decision making. Interdisciplinary, family-centered cleft care fostered trust and positioned clinical teams as key mediators of genetic information, underscoring the influence of clinical communication on how families interpret genetic risk and approach future family planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: