Cross-sectional survey reveals improved financial performance and valuation among commercial banks following regulatory reforms, highlighting the importance of governance for stability.
The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of banking reforms on the financial performance of banks in Ghana. The study investigates how regulatory reforms, implemented by the Bank of Ghana, have influenced key financial performance indicators such as Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Tobin’s Q. Using a quantitative research approach, the study employs a causal research design and analyzes primary data collected through structured questionnaires from 2,500 respondents, including customers and employees from selected banks. Data analysis was conducted using Smart PLS software to explore the direct relationships between banking reforms and bank efficiency indicators. The findings revealed a strong and positive relationship between banking reforms and bank financial performance. The results indicate that the reforms have significantly improved ROA, ROE, and Tobin’s Q, underscoring the effectiveness of the reforms in enhancing profitability, market valuation, and operational efficiency. The study further highlights that ongoing reforms and improved governance structures are critical for sustaining these gains in the banking sector. Additionally, the study emphasizes the importance of customer engagement and technological innovation in ensuring continued growth and competitiveness. The study recommends that the Bank of Ghana continue strengthening regulatory reforms to sustain improvements in financial performance. Banks should prioritize robust governance frameworks, adopt advanced technological innovations, and actively engage customers to maintain competitiveness. Additionally, continuous monitoring and evaluation of reform impacts are essential to address emerging challenges and ensure long-term stability, profitability, and resilience within Ghana’s banking sector, fostering trust and sustainable growth across the industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AGYAPONG et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: