Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of 3D-FASE for the visualization of salivary gland ducts for use in MR sialographic sequences. METHODS: We compared MR sialographic images and virtual endoscopic views from 3D-FASE with those from three kinds of sequences described by previous reports in a 3D parotid gland duct model and volunteer. The four sequences were two-dimension fast spin-echo (2D-FSE), three-dimension fast spin-echo (3D-FSE), two-dimension fast asymmetric spin-echo (2D-FASE), and three-dimension fast asymmetric spin-echo (3D-FASE). RESULTS: In the 3D parotid gland duct model, image visibility on visual score was clearest with 3D-FSE, followed by 3D-FASE (P = 0.028). In the volunteers, the visualization of images improved in the following order: 3D-FASE > 3D-FSE > 2D-FSE > 2D-FASE. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of 3D-FASE sequencing is more suitable and useful for MR sialography with an appropriate acquisition time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morimoto et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: