This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A common framework is necessary for the transparent articulation of the benefits and risks of a therapeutic product across disparate stakeholders. The assignment of value and weighting to each component parameter presents challenges deriving from different stakeholder objectives, methods, and perspectives. Building on prior experiences with a validated framework approach, this forum focused on identifying challenges and approaches to the assignment of values and weightings using a case study applied to a hypothetical medicinal product.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walker et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: