Key result
The patient-specific reduced order model accurately predicted fractional flow reserve in real-time with a correlation coefficient of 0.982 and a mean error of 0.005 compared to three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulations.
Why the study?
Clinical use of predictive blood flow modeling has been limited by the significant time required to perform virtual interventions and compute hemodynamic changes.
Does a physics-driven reduced order model accurately predict fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography compared to high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics?
Does a physics-driven reduced order model accurately predict fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography compared to high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics?
Effect estimate: Correlation coefficient 0.982 (95% CI 0.981-0.984)
p-value: p=<0.001
A physics-driven reduced order model can predict fractional flow reserve from coronary CT angiography in real time with high accuracy compared to standard computational fluid dynamics.
Enables real-time FFR estimation from coronary CT; leaves open prospective validation against invasive measurements before clinical adoption.
Predictive modeling of blood flow and pressure have numerous applications ranging from non-invasive assessment of functional significance of disease to planning invasive procedures. While several such predictive modeling techniques have been proposed, their use in the clinic has been limited due in part to the significant time required to perform virtual interventions and compute the resultant changes in hemodynamic conditions. We propose a fast hemodynamic assessment method based on first constructing an exploration space of geometries, tailored to each patient, and subsequently building a physics driven reduced order model in this space. We demonstrate that this method can predict fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in response to changes to a patient-specific lumen geometry in real time while achieving high accuracy when compared to computational fluid dynamics simulations. We validated this method on over 1300 patients that received a coronary CT scan and demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.98 with an error of 0.005 +- 0.015 (95% confidence interval: (-0.020, 0.031)) as compared to three-dimensional blood flow calculations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sankaran et al. (2019) studied Coronary artery disease (n=1,331). Patient-specific reduced order model (PSROM) vs. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations was evaluated on Fractional flow reserve (FFR) prediction accuracy (Correlation coefficient 0.982, 95% CI 0.981-0.984, p=<0.001). The patient-specific reduced order model accurately predicted fractional flow reserve in real-time with a correlation coefficient of 0.982 and a mean error of 0.005 compared to three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: