Key result
Coordinating cardiac rehabilitation referrals to facilities closer to patients' homes or workplaces increased overall participation from 23% to >50%.
Why the study?
Travel time to cardiac rehabilitation centers is a barrier to participation, especially for patients living far from tertiary centers.
Does a coordinated referral to a nearer-to-home cardiac rehabilitation program improve participation rates in cardiovascular patients?
Observational (n=2,912)
Does a coordinated referral to a nearer-to-home cardiac rehabilitation program improve participation rates in cardiovascular patients?
Coordinating cardiac rehabilitation referrals to facilities closer to a patient's home or workplace is a low-cost, effective strategy that significantly increases participation rates.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May boost CR participation via nearer referrals; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
PURPOSE: Time to travel to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) centers is a barrier to participation, and tertiary referral centers often care for patients living at a substantial distance. We sought to determine the impact of referring eligible patients to CR centers closer to home or workplace on overall participation rate. METHODS: An observational review was conducted in patients from a large cardiovascular program who were referred to CR (January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2016). Those declining participation due to distance from their home were identified and provided coordinated referral to a CR program they chose near their home or workplace. RESULTS: Of the 2912 patients referred to CR, 673 (23%) participated and 1900 declined due to distance. Contact was made in 2017 with 1237 of the 1900 of whom 1083 recalled a discussion of distance referral and completed the phone survey. Participants mean age was 64 yr, predominantly White (88%), male (65%), married (66%), and 70% had ≥ comorbidity. Out of the 1083 referred to a local CR program, 78% reported attending. Of those who attended CR, 55% (469/849) would not have attended had they not been referred to a program closer to their home or workplace. Overall participation increased from 23% to >50% of those referred from our institution. CONCLUSIONS: Coordinating CR referrals from the discharging facility to facilities closer to home or workplace is an effective means for increasing participation. The very low-cost effort has the potential to have a very meaningful impact on the long-term outcome of cardiovascular patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bryant et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease requiring cardiac rehabilitation (n=2,912). Coordinated referral to a cardiac rehabilitation program closer to home or workplace vs. Standard referral (baseline participation) was evaluated on Overall cardiac rehabilitation participation rate. Coordinating cardiac rehabilitation referrals to facilities closer to patients' homes or workplaces increased overall participation from 23% to >50%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: